Home/Sports/Predictions/Handball/Liga Nationala Romania Predictions
18+ gambleaware.org

LIGA NATIONALA PREDICTIONS

2026/2027

Flat Betting Model

9
Matches w/ Odds
$10
Stake Per Bet
+80%
Best: HT Draw
-100%
Worst: Draw Bet

Odds Range Filter

1.0
10.0

Use minimum and maximum odds selection tool to identify the most profitable ranges for the Flat Betting football prediction model for Liga Nationala Romania. After each change on the odds range, the system filters qualifying bets and recalculates profits and losses based on those selections.

Market ROI Summary

Flat $10 stake on every match from start to end of season. Profit/loss and ROI per market.

MarketBetsWinsWin %StakedReturnP&LROIBest Str.Worst Str.Trend
Home Bet9666.67%$90$89.9−$0.10-0.11%41
Draw Bet900%$90$0−$90.00-100%09
Away Bet9333.33%$90$43.1−$46.90-52.11%14
Over9444.44%$90$73.5−$16.50-18.33%24
Under9555.56%$90$92.6+$2.60+2.89%42
HT Home9333.33%$90$43.3−$46.70-51.89%12
HT Draw9222.22%$90$162+$72.00+80%13
HT Away9444.44%$90$70.3−$19.70-21.89%23
Favorite99100%$90$133+$43.00+47.78%90
Underdog900%$90$0−$90.00-100%09

Staking Plan Comparison

Same bets, different stake sizing. Flat = $10 every bet. Kelly ¼ = stake based on rolling edge estimate (quarter-Kelly for safety). Confidence = stake proportional to implied probability (more on favorites, less on longshots).

MarketBetsFlat P&LFlat ROIKelly ¼ P&LKelly ¼ ROIConf P&LConf ROIComparison
Home Bet9−$0.10-0.11%−$30.90-100%+$28.82+22.97%
Draw Bet9−$90.00-100%$0.000%−$104.23-100%
Away Bet9−$46.90-52.11%−$5.50-100%−$21.01-24.54%
Over9−$16.50-18.33%$0.000%−$19.60-19.9%
Under9+$2.60+2.89%−$21.02-65.86%+$1.44+1.63%
HT Home9−$46.70-51.89%−$7.23-100%−$55.43-44.63%
HT Draw9+$72.00+80%−$1.41-11.19%+$99.36+100.21%
HT Away9−$19.70-21.89%−$12.77-100%−$10.58-12.55%
Favorite9+$43.00+47.78%+$44.76+35.12%+$35.90+39.37%
Underdog9−$90.00-100%$0.000%−$123.80-100%

Staking Methods

Flat Stake:
Fixed $10 on every qualifying bet regardless of odds or edge.
Kelly ¼:
Stake = bankroll × (edge / (odds−1)) / 4. Uses rolling win rate as probability estimate. Grows bankroll when winning, shrinks when losing.
Confidence-weighted:
Stake = (implied prob / rolling avg implied prob) × $10. Bets more on favorites, less on longshots. Uses your previous bets' average to calculate each stake — applicable in real time.

By Team Bets

Flat $10 on this team's Win result in every match. Sorted by ROI.

TeamBetsWinsWin %P&LROI
CSM Bucuresti33100%+$24.20+80.67%
Din. Bucuresti22100%+$2.60+13%
Buzau000%$0.000%
Steaua Bucuresti000%$0.000%
Potaissa Turda000%$0.000%
Teutonii Ghimbav000%$0.000%
Minaur Baia Mare4375%−$0.40-1%
Suceava3133.33%−$13.40-44.67%
Timisoara100%−$10.00-100%
Cluj200%−$20.00-100%
Vaslui100%−$10.00-100%
CSM Constanta200%−$20.00-100%

PPG Model

12
Teams
1
League Avg PPG
1.06
Home Factor
λ=0.85
WPPG Decay

Odds Range Filter

1.0
10.0

Use minimum and maximum odds selection tool to identify the most profitable ranges for the PPG football prediction model for Liga Nationala Romania. After each change on the odds range, the system filters qualifying bets and recalculates profits and losses based on those selections.

PPG / WPPG Betting ROI

Backtested ROI betting $10 using incremental PPG — seeded with previous season data, blending into current-season results.

StrategyBetsWinsWin %P&LROITrend
Home Win200%−$20.00-100%
Draw700%−$70.00-100%
Away Win400%−$40.00-100%

Strategy Guide

PPG Favorite:
Backs the team with the higher PPG to win, whether home or away.
PPG Home Pick:
Bets on the home team only when PPG rates them higher than the visitor.
PPG Away Pick:
Bets on the away team only when PPG rates them higher than the home side.
WPPG Favorite:
Same as PPG Favorite but uses Weighted PPG (recent form weighted more heavily).
PPG Value:
Only bets when the PPG fair odds are lower than the bookmaker's odds — positive expected value. E.g. fair odds 1.80 vs bookmaker 2.10 = value bet.

Staking Plan Comparison

Same PPG bets, different stake sizing. Flat = $10 every bet. Kelly ¼ = stake based on rolling edge estimate. Confidence = stake proportional to implied probability.

StrategyBetsFlat P&LFlat ROIKelly ¼ P&LKelly ¼ ROIConf P&LConf ROIComparison
Home Win2−$20.00-100%−$5.00-25%−$2.00-10%
Draw7−$70.00-100%−$14.36-20.51%−$5.93-8.47%
Away Win4−$40.00-100%−$8.81-22.03%−$3.71-9.28%

Staking Methods

Flat Stake:
Fixed $10 on every qualifying bet regardless of odds or edge.
Kelly ¼:
Stake = bankroll × (edge / (odds−1)) / 4. Uses rolling win rate as probability estimate.
Confidence-weighted:
Stake = (implied prob / rolling avg implied prob) × $10. Bets more on favorites, less on longshots. Uses previous bets' average — applicable in real time.

Recent Results — PPG Predictions vs Actual

How PPG predictions compared to actual match results

DateMatchPPG PickProbFair OddsResult✓
24 OctCluj vs Din. BucurestiDin. Bucuresti75.06%1.3325 – 33✓
23 OctMinaur Baia Mare vs SuceavaMinaur Baia Mare48.65%2.0639 – 33✓
23 OctTeutonii Ghimbav vs BuzauBuzau79.59%1.2622 – 32✓
22 OctCSM Bucuresti vs CSM ConstantaCSM Bucuresti64.95%1.5427 – 25✓
18 OctSteaua Bucuresti vs Teutonii GhimbavSteaua Bucuresti44.17%2.2639 – 29✓

Upcoming Fixtures — PPG Predictions

Win probabilities for upcoming matches based on current PPG ratings

DateMatchPPG PickProbFair Odds
27 OctTimisoara vs VasluiTimisoara48.53%2.06
28 OctPotaissa Turda vs Steaua Bucuresti***0%0
13 NovVaslui vs Cluj
🔒

Login or register for free to see predictions data.

13 NovSuceava vs Timisoara
13 NovSteaua Bucuresti vs CSM Bucuresti

PPG Ratings — All Teams

Points Per Game overall, home, away, and weighted (WPPG with λ=0.85 decay). Click column headers to sort.

TeamPPG ↓H-PPGA-PPGWPPGvs AvgStrength
1Din. Bucuresti1.6721.51.65+0.67
2CSM Bucuresti1.671.521.7+0.67
3Minaur Baia Mare1.51.7511.5+0.50
4Timisoara1.4211.32+0.40
5Vaslui1.220.671.18+0.20
6Potaissa Turda1.211.51.33+0.20
7Buzau1111.10.00
8Suceava11.330.670.760.00
9CSM Constanta0.670.670.670.64-0.33
10Steaua Bucuresti0.40.6700.54-0.60
11Cluj0.330.6700.35-0.67
12Teutonii Ghimbav0000-1.00

PPG vs WPPG — Biggest Divergence

Teams where PPG and Weighted PPG disagree most — indicates recent form shift

Suceava
PPG: 1WPPG: 0.76Gap: ↓ 0.24
Recent form declining — WPPG dropping below season PPG
Steaua Bucuresti
PPG: 0.4WPPG: 0.54Gap: ↑ 0.14
Recent form better than season average — WPPG rising
Potaissa Turda
PPG: 1.2WPPG: 1.33Gap: ↑ 0.13
Recent form better than season average — WPPG rising
Buzau
PPG: 1WPPG: 1.1Gap: ↑ 0.10
Recent form better than season average — WPPG rising
Timisoara
PPG: 1.4WPPG: 1.32Gap: ↓ 0.08
Recent form declining — WPPG dropping below season PPG

Worked Example — Cluj vs Din. Bucuresti

Cluj PPG
0.4
vs
Din. Bucuresti PPG
1.62
P(Cluj) = 0.4 / (0.4+1.62) × 1.06
= 0.198 × 1.06 = 20% → Fair odds 5
P(Draw) = 0.2 × (1 − |diff|)
= 4.94% → Fair odds 20.25
P(Din. Bucuresti) = 1 − 20% − 4.94%
= 75.06% → Fair odds 1.33

Goals Model

Select Match

29.07
Home xG (λ)
26.11
Away xG (λ)
55.18
Total E[goals]
28.79
League Avg Home
28.38
League Avg Away

Derived Markets

Home Win
62.97%
Fair odds: 1.59
Draw
4.96%
Fair odds: 20.17
Away Win
32.07%
Fair odds: 3.12
Over 45.590.37%/ Under 9.63%Fair: 1.11
Over 50.573.57%/ Under 26.43%Fair: 1.36
Over 55.548.28%/ Under 51.72%Fair: 2.07
Over 60.523.69%/ Under 76.31%Fair: 4.22

Team Attack & Defense Strength

Attack/defense strength relative to league average (1.00 = average). Used to derive expected goals (xG) for each match.

TeamAtt (H)Def (H)Att (A)Def (A)H GPA GP
CSM Constanta0.860.940.930.9233
Din. Bucuresti1.170.841.040.8924
Steaua Bucuresti1.051.070.950.9932
Buzau1.081.011.061.0224
CSM Bucuresti1.161.060.990.9342
Teutonii Ghimbav0.941.111.071.2333
Suceava1.061.091.051.0733
Vaslui1.010.9711.0223
Minaur Baia Mare1.030.941.040.9542
Cluj0.881.040.891.0333
Potaissa Turda0.910.910.920.8532
Timisoara0.990.921.04123

How Poisson Predictions Work

Step 1 — Expected Goals:
Home xG = Home Attack Strength × Away Defense Weakness × League Avg Home Goals. Each team's attack and defense ratings are calculated relative to the league average.
Step 2 — Poisson Formula:
P(k goals) = e⁻λ × λᵏ / k! — models the probability of scoring exactly k goals given the expected goals (λ).
Step 3 — Score Matrix:
Multiply home and away goal probabilities for every combination (0-0 through 6-6) to build a full probability grid for every possible scoreline.
Step 4 — Dixon-Coles:
Apply ρ correction to fix Poisson's underestimation of low-scoring draws (0-0, 1-1, 1-0, 0-1). This is the key improvement over basic Poisson.
Step 5 — Derive Markets:
Sum probabilities from the matrix to derive 1X2, Over/Under, BTTS, and correct score probabilities — then convert to fair odds for value identification.

Elo Rating

Current Elo Ratings

All teams ranked by Elo. Start rating: 1500. K-factor: 32. Home advantage: +60 Elo.

1Din. Bucuresti
1562
2CSM Bucuresti
1555
3Minaur Baia Mare
1539
4Timisoara
1535
5Potaissa Turda
1519
6Vaslui
1516
7Buzau
1504
8Suceava
1494
9CSM Constanta
1470
10Steaua Bucuresti
1453
11Cluj
1441
12Teutonii Ghimbav
1412

Elo → Win Probability Table

How Elo difference translates to win probability.

Elo DiffP(Higher wins)Fair OddsTypical Matchup
050.0%2.00Evenly matched
5057.1%1.75Mid vs mid-lower
10064.0%1.56Top-8 vs bottom-8
15070.3%1.42Din. Bucuresti vs Teutonii Ghimbav
20076.0%1.32Leader vs bottom half
25080.8%1.24Leader vs bottom 3
30084.9%1.18Din. Bucuresti vs Teutonii Ghimbav

Elo Rating History — Top 6

How the top 6 teams' Elo ratings evolved across the season.

146915211572
Din. BucurestiCSM BucurestiMinaur Baia MareTimisoaraPotaissa TurdaVaslui

Elo Ratings — All Teams

Current Elo rating, peak Elo this season, and results. Start rating: 1500.

#TeamEloPeakΔGPWDL
1Din. Bucuresti15621562+626501
2CSM Bucuresti15551555+556501
3Minaur Baia Mare15391539+396411
4Timisoara15351550+355311
5Potaissa Turda15191519+195221
6Vaslui15161529+165302
7Buzau15041519+46303
8Suceava14941541-66303
9CSM Constanta14701500-306204
10Steaua Bucuresti14531500-485104
11Cluj14411500-596105
12Teutonii Ghimbav14121500-886006

Elo Betting ROI

Backtested ROI using incremental Elo ratings — ratings computed from matches played before each bet.

StrategyBetsWinsWin %P&LROITrend
Elo Value (edge > 3%)500%−$50.00-100%
Elo Favourite6583%+$11.70+19.5%
Elo Home Pick (>55%)11100%+$4.20+42%

Staking Plan Comparison

Same Elo bets, different stake sizing. Flat = $10 every bet. Kelly ¼ and Confidence-weighted alternatives.

StrategyBetsFlat P&LFlat ROIKelly ¼ P&LKelly ¼ ROIConf P&LConf ROIComparison
Elo Value (edge > 3%)5−$50.00-100%$0.000%−$42.90-100%
Elo Favourite6+$11.70+19.5%$0.000%+$16.55+22.25%
Elo Home Pick (>55%)1+$4.20+42%$0.000%+$4.20+42%

Staking Methods

Flat Stake:
Fixed $10 on every qualifying bet regardless of odds or edge.
Kelly ¼:
Stake = bankroll × (edge / (odds−1)) / 4. Uses rolling win rate as probability estimate. Grows bankroll when winning, shrinks when losing.
Confidence-weighted:
Stake = (implied prob / rolling avg implied prob) × $10. Bets more on favorites, less on longshots. Uses your previous bets' average to calculate each stake — applicable in real time.

How Elo Ratings Work

Step 1 — Starting Rating:
Every team starts at 1500. Higher Elo means a stronger team.
Step 2 — Expected Score:
E(A) = 1 / (1 + 10^(R_B − R_A) / 400). If Arsenal is rated 1600 and Wolves is 1450, Arsenal's expected score is 0.71.
Step 3 — Update After Match:
R_new = R_old + K × (S − E), where S is the actual result (1 = win, 0.5 = draw, 0 = loss) and K=32 controls sensitivity.
Step 4 — Home Advantage:
Home team gets +60 Elo boost when calculating expected scores, reflecting the statistical home advantage in football.
Step 5 — Betting:
Convert Elo difference into win/draw/loss probabilities, compare against bookmaker odds, and bet when the model spots value.

Value Scanner

No upcoming matches with odds available. Please check back later.