Home/Sports/Predictions/Football/Premier League England

Premier League England Prediction Models

2026/2027

Flat Betting Model

Matches w/ Odds

$10

Stake Per Bet

+20.96%

Best: Under 2.5

-15.63%

Worst: Away Underdog

Odds Range Filter

1.0

10.0

Use minimum and maximum odds selection tool to identify the most profitable ranges for the Flat Betting football prediction model for Premier League England. After each change on the odds range, the system filters qualifying bets and recalculates profits and losses based on those selections.

Market ROI Summary

Flat $10 stake on every match from start to end of season. Profit/loss and ROI per market.

Market	Bets	Wins	Win %	Staked	Return	P&L	ROI	Best Str.	Worst Str.
Home Bet	80	31	38.75%	$800	$747.9	−$52.10	-6.51%	4	9
Draw Bet	80	23	28.75%	$800	$922.6	+$122.60	+15.33%	3	11
Away Bet	80	26	32.5%	$800	$725.6	−$74.40	-9.3%	3	5
Over 2.5	80	40	50%	$800	$701.8	−$98.20	-12.27%	7	6
Under 2.5	80	40	50%	$800	$967.7	+$167.70	+20.96%	6	7
BTTS Yes	80	40	50%	$800	$680.5	−$119.50	-14.94%	5	4
Home Favorite	48	23	47.92%	$480	$412	−$68.00	-14.17%	3	6
Away Underdog	27	5	18.52%	$270	$227.8	−$42.20	-15.63%	1	10
Favorite	80	37	46.25%	$800	$688.8	−$111.20	-13.9%	4	6
Underdog	80	20	25%	$800	$784.7	−$15.30	-1.91%	3	10

Staking Plan Comparison

Same bets, different stake sizing. Flat = $10 every bet. Kelly ¼ = stake based on rolling edge estimate (quarter-Kelly for safety). Confidence = stake proportional to implied probability (more on favorites, less on longshots).

Market	Bets	Flat P&L	Flat ROI	Kelly ¼ P&L	Kelly ¼ ROI	Conf P&L	Conf ROI
Home Bet	80	−$52.10	-6.51%	−$49.06	-23.05%	−$101.21	-12.64%
Draw Bet	80	+$122.60	+15.33%	+$8.49	+5.32%	+$110.05	+13.06%
Away Bet	80	−$74.40	-9.3%	−$45.09	-56.23%	−$39.46	-4.75%
Over 2.5	80	−$98.20	-12.27%	−$26.93	-26.56%	−$95.01	-11.43%
Under 2.5	80	+$167.70	+20.96%	+$23.44	+12.61%	+$163.77	+19.79%
BTTS Yes	80	−$119.50	-14.94%	−$9.25	-78.99%	−$134.34	-16.03%
Home Favorite	48	−$68.00	-14.17%	−$33.18	-38.27%	−$62.37	-12.87%
Away Underdog	27	−$42.20	-15.63%	−$9.48	-76.14%	−$6.87	-2.47%
Favorite	80	−$111.20	-13.9%	−$33.12	-45.28%	−$88.55	-11.28%
Underdog	80	−$15.30	-1.91%	−$56.26	-78.47%	+$145.45	+16.34%

Staking Methods

Flat Stake:: Fixed $10 on every qualifying bet regardless of odds or edge.
Kelly ¼:: Stake = bankroll × (edge / (odds−1)) / 4. Uses rolling win rate as probability estimate. Grows bankroll when winning, shrinks when losing.
Confidence-weighted:: Stake = (implied prob / rolling avg implied prob) × $10. Bets more on favorites, less on longshots. Uses your previous bets' average to calculate each stake — applicable in real time.

Flat $10 on this team's Win result in every match. Sorted by ROI.

Team	Bets	Wins	Win %	P&L	ROI
Hull City	8	2	25%	+$65.20	+81.5%
Brighton & Hove Albion	8	5	62.5%	+$47.60	+59.5%
Manchester City	8	7	87.5%	+$36.30	+45.38%
Aston Villa	8	3	37.5%	+$35.70	+44.63%
Arsenal FC	8	7	87.5%	+$26.20	+32.75%
Ipswich Town	8	3	37.5%	+$17.90	+22.37%
Liverpool	8	4	50%	+$7.30	+9.13%
Coventry City	8	2	25%	+$7.00	+8.75%
Chelsea	8	4	50%	−$1.70	-2.12%
Newcastle United	8	3	37.5%	−$8.70	-10.88%
Crystal Palace	8	2	25%	−$18.50	-23.12%
Tottenham Hotspur	8	2	25%	−$21.90	-27.38%
Leeds United	8	2	25%	−$22.30	-27.87%
Brentford	8	2	25%	−$26.20	-32.75%
AFC Bournemouth	8	2	25%	−$28.00	-35%
Everton	8	2	25%	−$38.70	-48.37%
Fulham	8	2	25%	−$40.20	-50.25%
Nottingham Forest	8	1	12.5%	−$46.00	-57.5%
Sunderland	8	1	12.5%	−$52.00	-65%
Manchester United	8	1	12.5%	−$65.50	-81.87%

PPG Model

Teams

1.36

League Avg PPG

1.08

Home Factor

λ=0.85

WPPG Decay

Odds Range Filter

1.0

10.0

Use minimum and maximum odds selection tool to identify the most profitable ranges for the PPG football prediction model for Premier League England. After each change on the odds range, the system filters qualifying bets and recalculates profits and losses based on those selections.

PPG / WPPG Betting ROI

Backtested ROI betting $10 using incremental PPG — seeded with previous season data, blending into current-season results.

Strategy	Bets	Wins	Win %	P&L	ROI
PPG Favorite (1×2)	75	28	37.33%	−$155.10	-20.68%
PPG Home Pick	34	14	41.18%	−$90.50	-26.62%
PPG Away Pick	41	14	34.15%	−$64.60	-15.76%
WPPG Favorite (1×2)	79	28	35.44%	−$187.10	-23.68%
PPG Value (fair < market)	80	22	27.5%	−$150.80	-18.85%

Strategy Guide

PPG Favorite:: Backs the team with the higher PPG to win, whether home or away.
PPG Home Pick:: Bets on the home team only when PPG rates them higher than the visitor.
PPG Away Pick:: Bets on the away team only when PPG rates them higher than the home side.
WPPG Favorite:: Same as PPG Favorite but uses Weighted PPG (recent form weighted more heavily).
PPG Value:: Only bets when the PPG fair odds are lower than the bookmaker's odds — positive expected value. E.g. fair odds 1.80 vs bookmaker 2.10 = value bet.

Staking Plan Comparison

Same PPG bets, different stake sizing. Flat = $10 every bet. Kelly ¼ = stake based on rolling edge estimate. Confidence = stake proportional to implied probability.

Strategy	Bets	Flat P&L	Flat ROI	Kelly ¼ P&L	Kelly ¼ ROI	Conf P&L	Conf ROI
PPG Favorite (1×2)	75	−$155.10	-20.68%	−$51.21	-28.19%	−$130.48	-17.7%
PPG Home Pick	34	−$90.50	-26.62%	−$40.33	-43.15%	−$77.58	-23.33%
PPG Away Pick	41	−$64.60	-15.76%	−$33.64	-52.46%	−$45.16	-11.08%
WPPG Favorite (1×2)	79	−$187.10	-23.68%	−$52.18	-28.76%	−$159.41	-20.73%
PPG Value (fair < market)	80	−$150.80	-18.85%	−$58.71	-42.62%	−$9.93	-1.1%

Staking Methods

Flat Stake:: Fixed $10 on every qualifying bet regardless of odds or edge.
Kelly ¼:: Stake = bankroll × (edge / (odds−1)) / 4. Uses rolling win rate as probability estimate.
Confidence-weighted:: Stake = (implied prob / rolling avg implied prob) × $10. Bets more on favorites, less on longshots. Uses previous bets' average — applicable in real time.

Recent Results — PPG Predictions vs Actual

How PPG predictions compared to actual match results

Date	Match	PPG Pick	Prob	Fair Odds	Result	✓
25 Oct	Sunderland vs Leeds United	Leeds United	61.51%	1.63	0 – 0	✗
25 Oct	Manchester United vs AFC Bournemouth	Manchester United	47.19%	2.12	0 – 3	✗
25 Oct	Crystal Palace vs Newcastle United	Crystal Palace	40.86%	2.45	0 – 2	✗
25 Oct	Hull City vs Brentford	Hull City	41.25%	2.42	1 – 1	✗
25 Oct	Liverpool vs Brighton & Hove Albion	Brighton & Hove Albion	41.52%	2.41	2 – 0	✗

Upcoming Fixtures — PPG Predictions

Win probabilities for upcoming matches based on current PPG ratings

Date	Match	PPG Pick	Prob	Fair Odds
31 Oct	Chelsea vs Manchester United	Chelsea	58.86%	1.7
31 Oct	Hull City vs Ipswich Town	***	0%	0
31 Oct	AFC Bournemouth vs Leeds United	🔒 Login or register for free to see predictions data.
31 Oct	Brentford vs Nottingham Forest
31 Oct	Coventry City vs Sunderland

PPG Ratings — All Teams

Points Per Game overall, home, away, and weighted (WPPG with λ=0.85 decay). Click column headers to sort.

Team	PPG ↓	H-PPG	A-PPG	WPPG	vs Avg
1Arsenal FC	2.63	3	2.25	2.62	+1.27
2Manchester City	2.63	3	2.25	2.38	+1.27
3Brighton & Hove Albion	2	2.5	1.5	1.97	+0.64
4Liverpool	1.88	1.25	2.5	2.05	+0.52
5Chelsea	1.63	1.75	1.5	1.51	+0.27
6Leeds United	1.38	1.5	1.25	1.2	+0.02
7Brentford	1.38	1.75	1	1.21	+0.02
8Aston Villa	1.38	1	1.75	1.76	+0.02
9Newcastle United	1.38	1.25	1.5	1.39	+0.02
10Hull City	1.25	1.5	1	0.99	-0.11
11Everton	1.25	1.75	0.75	1	-0.11
12Ipswich Town	1.25	1.75	0.75	1.17	-0.11
13Tottenham Hotspur	1.13	1	1.25	1.49	-0.23
14AFC Bournemouth	1.13	1.25	1	1.42	-0.23
15Fulham	1	1	1	1.38	-0.36
16Manchester United	0.88	1	0.75	0.78	-0.48
17Crystal Palace	0.88	0.75	1	0.85	-0.48
18Coventry City	0.75	0.75	0.75	0.83	-0.61
19Nottingham Forest	0.75	0.25	1.25	0.7	-0.61
20Sunderland	0.63	1	0.25	0.53	-0.73

PPG vs WPPG — Biggest Divergence

Teams where PPG and Weighted PPG disagree most — indicates recent form shift

Aston Villa

PPG: 1.38WPPG: 1.76Gap: ↑ 0.38

Recent form better than season average — WPPG rising

Fulham

PPG: 1WPPG: 1.38Gap: ↑ 0.38

Recent form better than season average — WPPG rising

Tottenham Hotspur

PPG: 1.13WPPG: 1.49Gap: ↑ 0.36

Recent form better than season average — WPPG rising

AFC Bournemouth

PPG: 1.13WPPG: 1.42Gap: ↑ 0.29

Recent form better than season average — WPPG rising

Hull City

PPG: 1.25WPPG: 0.99Gap: ↓ 0.26

Recent form declining — WPPG dropping below season PPG

Worked Example — Sunderland vs Leeds United

P(Sunderland) = 0.57 / (0.57+1.43) × 1.08

= 0.285 × 1.08 = 27.81% → Fair odds 3.6

P(Draw) = 0.268 × (1 − |diff|)

= 10.68% → Fair odds 9.36

P(Leeds United) = 1 − 27.81% − 10.68%

= 61.51% → Fair odds 1.63

Poisson / Correct Score

Select Match

2.19

Home xG (λ)

1.72

Away xG (λ)

3.91

Total E[goals]

1.51

League Avg Home

1.26

League Avg Away

Dixon-Coles Score Matrix — Chelsea vs Manchester United

30 Oct · Each cell shows the probability of that exact scoreline. Dixon-Coles corrected (ρ = -0.13). · Upcoming

H \ A	0	1	2	3	4	5	6
0	3.0%	2.5%	3.0%	1.7%	0.7%	0.3%	0.1%
1	3.4%	8.6%	6.5%	3.8%	1.6%	0.6%	0.2%
2	4.8%	8.3%	7.2%	4.1%	1.8%	0.6%	0.2%
3	3.5%	6.1%	5.2%	3.0%	1.3%	0.4%	0.1%
4	1.9%	3.3%	2.9%	1.6%	0.7%	0.2%	0.1%
5	0.8%	1.5%	1.3%	0.7%	0.3%	0.1%	0.0%
6	0.3%	0.5%	0.5%	0.3%	0.1%	0.0%	0.0%

Most likely High Medium Low

Derived Markets

Home Win

47.6%

Fair odds: 2.1

Draw

22.63%

Fair odds: 4.42

Away Win

29.77%

Fair odds: 3.36

Over 0.596.99%/ Under 3.01%Fair: 1.03

Over 1.591.06%/ Under 8.94%Fair: 1.1

Over 2.574.61%/ Under 25.39%Fair: 1.34

Over 3.554.45%/ Under 45.55%Fair: 1.84

Over 4.534.75%/ Under 65.25%Fair: 2.88

BTTS Yes73.8%Fair: 1.36

BTTS No26.2%Fair: 3.82

Correct Score — Top 12

11-1

8.61%D

22-1

8.34%H

32-2

7.18%D

41-2

6.55%A

53-1

6.09%H

63-2

5.24%H

72-0

4.85%H

82-3

4.11%A

91-3

3.76%A

103-0

3.54%H

111-0

3.44%H

124-1

3.33%H

Dixon-Coles vs Plain Poisson

Where the low-score correction adds value

Plain Poisson

P(0-0) = 2.0%

P(1-0) = 4.4%

P(0-1) = 3.5%

P(1-1) = 7.5%

✗ Underestimates 0-0, 1-0, 0-1

Dixon-Coles (ρ correction)

P(0-0) = 3.0% (+1.0%)

P(1-0) = 3.4% (-0.9%)

P(0-1) = 2.5% (-1.0%)

P(1-1) = 8.6% (+1.1%)

✓ Fixes low-score underestimation

💡 Why does this matter? Draws in football are dominated by 0-0 and 1-1. Plain Poisson underprices these by 15–20%. Dixon-Coles corrects this, generating better ROI on draw markets.

Dixon-Coles Betting ROI

Backtested ROI using incremental Poisson/Dixon-Coles model — xG computed only from matches played before each bet.

Strategy	Bets	Wins	Win %	P&L	ROI
DC Value (1X2 edge > 3%)	65	17	26.15%	−$134.80	-20.74%
DC Home Pick (>50%)	31	12	38.71%	−$103.60	-33.42%
DC Away Pick (>50%)	8	4	50%	+$4.00	+5%
DC Draw (>28%)	23	9	39.13%	+$95.80	+41.65%
DC Over 2.5 Value	31	15	48.39%	−$41.10	-13.26%
DC BTTS Value	21	13	61.9%	+$13.80	+6.57%

Staking Plan Comparison

Same Dixon-Coles bets, different stake sizing. Flat = $10 every bet. Kelly ¼ and Confidence-weighted alternatives.

Strategy	Bets	Flat P&L	Flat ROI	Kelly ¼ P&L	Kelly ¼ ROI	Conf P&L	Conf ROI
DC Value (1X2 edge > 3%)	65	−$134.80	-20.74%	−$42.20	-57.5%	−$125.99	-20.15%
DC Home Pick (>50%)	31	−$103.60	-33.42%	−$17.03	-100%	−$85.15	-24.64%
DC Away Pick (>50%)	8	+$4.00	+5%	−$12.34	-100%	+$19.01	+19.49%
DC Draw (>28%)	23	+$95.80	+41.65%	−$1.34	-2.2%	+$120.65	+50.73%
DC Over 2.5 Value	31	−$41.10	-13.26%	−$5.15	-28.27%	−$42.54	-12.72%
DC BTTS Value	21	+$13.80	+6.57%	+$5.44	+16.8%	+$9.26	+4.23%

Staking Methods

Flat Stake:: Fixed $10 on every qualifying bet regardless of odds or edge.
Kelly ¼:: Stake = bankroll × (edge / (odds−1)) / 4. Uses rolling win rate as probability estimate. Grows bankroll when winning, shrinks when losing.
Confidence-weighted:: Stake = (implied prob / rolling avg implied prob) × $10. Bets more on favorites, less on longshots. Uses your previous bets' average to calculate each stake — applicable in real time.

Team Attack & Defense Strength

Attack/defense strength relative to league average (1.00 = average). Used to derive expected goals (xG) for each match.

Team	Att (H)	Def (H)	Att (A)	Def (A)	H GP	A GP
Brighton & Hove Albion	1.78	0.42	1.64	0.96	4	4
Manchester City	1.73	0.99	1.65	0.57	4	4
Chelsea	1.51	1.42	1.25	1.08	4	4
Brentford	1.26	0.7	1.11	1.02	4	4
Arsenal FC	1.46	0.42	0.96	0.52	4	4
Ipswich Town	0.89	0.99	1.26	1.55	4	4
AFC Bournemouth	0.89	0.81	1.34	1.38	4	4
Newcastle United	1.07	1.22	1.04	1.17	4	4
Liverpool	0.83	0.95	1.34	0.71	4	4
Manchester United	1.11	1.27	0.96	0.96	4	4
Hull City	0.89	0.73	0.86	0.89	4	4
Crystal Palace	0.88	1.65	0.72	1.31	4	4
Leeds United	0.99	0.7	0.69	0.73	4	4
Aston Villa	0.92	1.11	0.87	0.97	4	4
Everton	0.85	0.91	0.7	0.82	4	4
Tottenham Hotspur	0.81	1.24	0.77	0.74	4	4
Fulham	1	1.21	0.51	0.69	4	4
Coventry City	0.77	1.39	0.6	1.11	4	4
Sunderland	0.4	0.81	0.9	1.43	4	4
Nottingham Forest	0.23	0.73	1.2	1.09	4	4

How Poisson Predictions Work

Step 1 — Expected Goals:: Home xG = Home Attack Strength × Away Defense Weakness × League Avg Home Goals. Each team's attack and defense ratings are calculated relative to the league average.
Step 2 — Poisson Formula:: P(k goals) = e⁻λ × λᵏ / k! — models the probability of scoring exactly k goals given the expected goals (λ).
Step 3 — Score Matrix:: Multiply home and away goal probabilities for every combination (0-0 through 6-6) to build a full probability grid for every possible scoreline.
Step 4 — Dixon-Coles:: Apply ρ correction to fix Poisson's underestimation of low-scoring draws (0-0, 1-1, 1-0, 0-1). This is the key improvement over basic Poisson.
Step 5 — Derive Markets:: Sum probabilities from the matrix to derive 1X2, Over/Under, BTTS, and correct score probabilities — then convert to fair odds for value identification.

Elo Rating

Current Elo Ratings

All teams ranked by Elo. Start rating: 1500. K-factor: 32. Home advantage: +65 Elo.

1Arsenal FC

1583

2Manchester City

1578

3Liverpool

1547

4Brighton & Hove Albion

1543

5Aston Villa

1513

6Chelsea

1512

7Brentford

1511

8Leeds United

1509

9Everton

1498

10Newcastle United

1497

11Hull City

1493

12Tottenham Hotspur

1492

13AFC Bournemouth

1491

14Ipswich Town

1484

15Fulham

1478

16Manchester United

1469

17Crystal Palace

1458

18Nottingham Forest

1455

19Sunderland

1447

20Coventry City

1445

Elo → Win Probability Table

How Elo difference translates to win probability.

Elo Diff	P(Higher wins)	Fair Odds	Typical Matchup
0	50.0%	2.00	Evenly matched
50	57.1%	1.75	Mid vs mid-lower
100	64.0%	1.56	Top-8 vs bottom-8
150	70.3%	1.42	Top-4 vs relegation
200	76.0%	1.32	Leader vs bottom half
250	80.8%	1.24	Leader vs bottom 3
300	84.9%	1.18	Arsenal FC vs Coventry City

Elo Rating History — Top 6

How the top 6 teams' Elo ratings evolved across the season.

Arsenal FCManchester CityLiverpoolBrighton & Hove AlbionAston VillaChelsea

Elo Ratings — All Teams

Current Elo rating, peak Elo this season, and results. Start rating: 1500.

#	Team	Elo	Peak	Δ	GP	W	D	L
1	Arsenal FC	1583	1583	+83	8	7	0	1
2	Manchester City	1578	1595	+78	8	7	0	1
3	Liverpool	1547	1547	+47	8	4	3	1
4	Brighton & Hove Albion	1543	1557	+43	8	5	1	2
5	Aston Villa	1513	1513	+13	8	3	2	3
6	Chelsea	1512	1534	+12	8	4	1	3
7	Brentford	1511	1528	+11	8	2	5	1
8	Leeds United	1509	1531	+9	8	2	5	1
9	Everton	1498	1527	-2	8	2	4	2
10	Newcastle United	1497	1516	-3	8	3	2	3
11	Hull City	1493	1531	-7	8	2	4	2
12	Tottenham Hotspur	1492	1500	-8	8	2	3	3
13	AFC Bournemouth	1491	1500	-9	8	2	3	3
14	Ipswich Town	1484	1513	-16	8	3	1	4
15	Fulham	1478	1500	-23	8	2	2	4
16	Manchester United	1469	1505	-31	8	1	4	3
17	Crystal Palace	1458	1500	-42	8	2	1	5
18	Nottingham Forest	1455	1500	-45	8	1	3	4
19	Sunderland	1447	1503	-53	8	1	2	5
20	Coventry City	1445	1500	-55	8	2	0	6

Elo Betting ROI

Backtested ROI using incremental Elo ratings — ratings computed from matches played before each bet.

Strategy	Bets	Wins	Win %	P&L	ROI
Elo Value (edge > 3%)	50	12	24%	−$23.70	-4.74%
Elo Favourite	60	20	33%	−$186.50	-31.08%
Elo Home Pick (>55%)	2	2	100%	+$6.10	+30.5%
Elo Draw (>28%)	20	6	30%	+$18.50	+9.25%

Staking Plan Comparison

Same Elo bets, different stake sizing. Flat = $10 every bet. Kelly ¼ and Confidence-weighted alternatives.

Strategy	Bets	Flat P&L	Flat ROI	Kelly ¼ P&L	Kelly ¼ ROI	Conf P&L	Conf ROI
Elo Value (edge > 3%)	50	−$23.70	-4.74%	−$18.14	-36.51%	−$24.23	-4.61%
Elo Favourite	60	−$186.50	-31.08%	−$12.81	-100%	−$179.58	-28.21%
Elo Home Pick (>55%)	2	+$6.10	+30.5%	$0.00	0%	+$6.32	+30.27%
Elo Draw (>28%)	20	+$18.50	+9.25%	−$34.89	-69.41%	+$30.54	+15.33%

Staking Methods

Flat Stake:: Fixed $10 on every qualifying bet regardless of odds or edge.
Kelly ¼:: Stake = bankroll × (edge / (odds−1)) / 4. Uses rolling win rate as probability estimate. Grows bankroll when winning, shrinks when losing.
Confidence-weighted:: Stake = (implied prob / rolling avg implied prob) × $10. Bets more on favorites, less on longshots. Uses your previous bets' average to calculate each stake — applicable in real time.

How Elo Ratings Work

Step 1 — Starting Rating:: Every team starts at 1500. Higher Elo means a stronger team.
Step 2 — Expected Score:: E(A) = 1 / (1 + 10^(R_B − R_A) / 400). If Arsenal is rated 1600 and Wolves is 1450, Arsenal's expected score is 0.71.
Step 3 — Update After Match:: R_new = R_old + K × (S − E), where S is the actual result (1 = win, 0.5 = draw, 0 = loss) and K=32 controls sensitivity.
Step 4 — Home Advantage:: Home team gets +65 Elo boost when calculating expected scores, reflecting the statistical home advantage in football.
Step 5 — Betting:: Convert Elo difference into win/draw/loss probabilities, compare against bookmaker odds, and bet when the model spots value.

Value Scanner

No upcoming matches with odds available. Please check back later.

Premier League England Prediction Models

Flat Betting Model

Odds Range Filter

Market ROI Summary

Staking Plan Comparison

By Team Bets

PPG Model

Odds Range Filter

PPG / WPPG Betting ROI

Staking Plan Comparison

Recent Results — PPG Predictions vs Actual

Upcoming Fixtures — PPG Predictions

PPG Ratings — All Teams

PPG vs WPPG — Biggest Divergence

Worked Example — Sunderland vs Leeds United

Poisson / Correct Score

Select Match

Dixon-Coles Score Matrix — Chelsea vs Manchester United

Derived Markets

Correct Score — Top 12

Dixon-Coles vs Plain Poisson

Dixon-Coles Betting ROI

Staking Plan Comparison

Team Attack & Defense Strength

How Poisson Predictions Work

Elo Rating

Current Elo Ratings

Elo → Win Probability Table

Elo Rating History — Top 6

Elo Ratings — All Teams

Elo Betting ROI

Staking Plan Comparison

How Elo Ratings Work

Value Scanner