Ligue 1 Tunisia Prediction Models
2026/2027Flat Betting Model
Odds Range Filter
Use minimum and maximum odds selection tool to identify the most profitable ranges for the Flat Betting football prediction model for Ligue 1 Tunisia. After each change on the odds range, the system filters qualifying bets and recalculates profits and losses based on those selections.
Market ROI Summary
Flat $10 stake on every match from start to end of season. Profit/loss and ROI per market.
| Market | Bets | Wins | Win % | Staked | Return | P&L | ROI | Best Str. | Worst Str. | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home Bet | 28 | 15 | 53.57% | $280 | $324.6 | +$44.60 | +15.93% | 4 | 4 | |
| Draw Bet | 28 | 9 | 32.14% | $280 | $258.8 | −$21.20 | -7.57% | 3 | 4 | |
| Away Bet | 28 | 4 | 14.29% | $280 | $131 | −$149.00 | -53.21% | 2 | 16 | |
| Over 2.5 | 28 | 8 | 28.57% | $280 | $213.4 | −$66.60 | -23.79% | 2 | 5 | |
| Under 2.5 | 28 | 20 | 71.43% | $280 | $359 | +$79.00 | +28.21% | 5 | 2 | |
| BTTS Yes | 28 | 11 | 39.29% | $280 | $273.4 | −$6.60 | -2.36% | 2 | 4 | |
| Home Favorite | 20 | 12 | 60% | $200 | $209 | +$9.00 | +4.5% | 4 | 3 | |
| Away Underdog | 19 | 1 | 5.26% | $190 | $65 | −$125.00 | -65.79% | 1 | 11 | |
| Favorite | 28 | 15 | 53.57% | $280 | $274.6 | −$5.40 | -1.93% | 4 | 3 | |
| Underdog | 28 | 4 | 14.29% | $280 | $181 | −$99.00 | -35.36% | 2 | 13 |
Staking Plan Comparison
Same bets, different stake sizing. Flat = $10 every bet. Kelly ¼ = stake based on rolling edge estimate (quarter-Kelly for safety). Confidence = stake proportional to implied probability (more on favorites, less on longshots).
| Market | Bets | Flat P&L | Flat ROI | Kelly ¼ P&L | Kelly ¼ ROI | Conf P&L | Conf ROI | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home Bet | 28 | +$44.60 | +15.93% | +$34.17 | +22.39% | +$26.57 | +9.25% | |
| Draw Bet | 28 | −$21.20 | -7.57% | −$28.32 | -77.4% | −$9.38 | -3.33% | |
| Away Bet | 28 | −$149.00 | -53.21% | $0.00 | 0% | −$149.30 | -49.49% | |
| Over 2.5 | 28 | −$66.60 | -23.79% | $0.00 | 0% | −$71.18 | -24.53% | |
| Under 2.5 | 28 | +$79.00 | +28.21% | −$1.92 | -1.38% | +$70.29 | +21.48% | |
| BTTS Yes | 28 | −$6.60 | -2.36% | −$0.93 | -15.71% | −$13.60 | -4.7% | |
| Home Favorite | 20 | +$9.00 | +4.5% | −$26.74 | -32.51% | +$16.30 | +8.08% | |
| Away Underdog | 19 | −$125.00 | -65.79% | $0.00 | 0% | −$142.31 | -75.91% | |
| Favorite | 28 | −$5.40 | -1.93% | −$15.50 | -31.57% | +$5.61 | +1.92% | |
| Underdog | 28 | −$99.00 | -35.36% | $0.00 | 0% | −$99.95 | -34.71% |
Staking Methods
- Flat Stake:
- Fixed $10 on every qualifying bet regardless of odds or edge.
- Kelly ¼:
- Stake = bankroll × (edge / (odds−1)) / 4. Uses rolling win rate as probability estimate. Grows bankroll when winning, shrinks when losing.
- Confidence-weighted:
- Stake = (implied prob / rolling avg implied prob) × $10. Bets more on favorites, less on longshots. Uses your previous bets' average to calculate each stake — applicable in real time.
PPG Model
Odds Range Filter
Use minimum and maximum odds selection tool to identify the most profitable ranges for the PPG football prediction model for Ligue 1 Tunisia. After each change on the odds range, the system filters qualifying bets and recalculates profits and losses based on those selections.
PPG / WPPG Betting ROI
Backtested ROI betting $10 using incremental PPG — seeded with previous season data, blending into current-season results.
| Strategy | Bets | Wins | Win % | P&L | ROI | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPG Favorite (1×2) | 23 | 11 | 47.83% | −$27.40 | -11.91% | |
| PPG Home Pick | 13 | 8 | 61.54% | +$6.60 | +5.08% | |
| PPG Away Pick | 10 | 3 | 30% | −$34.00 | -34% | |
| WPPG Favorite (1×2) | 24 | 11 | 45.83% | −$37.40 | -15.58% | |
| PPG Value (fair < market) | 25 | 11 | 44% | +$18.00 | +7.2% |
Strategy Guide
- PPG Favorite:
- Backs the team with the higher PPG to win, whether home or away.
- PPG Home Pick:
- Bets on the home team only when PPG rates them higher than the visitor.
- PPG Away Pick:
- Bets on the away team only when PPG rates them higher than the home side.
- WPPG Favorite:
- Same as PPG Favorite but uses Weighted PPG (recent form weighted more heavily).
- PPG Value:
- Only bets when the PPG fair odds are lower than the bookmaker's odds — positive expected value. E.g. fair odds 1.80 vs bookmaker 2.10 = value bet.
Staking Plan Comparison
Same PPG bets, different stake sizing. Flat = $10 every bet. Kelly ¼ = stake based on rolling edge estimate. Confidence = stake proportional to implied probability.
| Strategy | Bets | Flat P&L | Flat ROI | Kelly ¼ P&L | Kelly ¼ ROI | Conf P&L | Conf ROI | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPG Favorite (1×2) | 23 | −$27.40 | -11.91% | −$19.73 | -63.24% | −$4.87 | -1.98% | |
| PPG Home Pick | 13 | +$6.60 | +5.08% | −$6.80 | -11.15% | +$1.57 | +1.33% | |
| PPG Away Pick | 10 | −$34.00 | -34% | −$0.89 | -100% | −$29.62 | -24.58% | |
| WPPG Favorite (1×2) | 24 | −$37.40 | -15.58% | −$19.33 | -72.83% | −$12.90 | -5.06% | |
| PPG Value (fair < market) | 25 | +$18.00 | +7.2% | −$15.14 | -21.58% | +$21.37 | +8.18% |
Staking Methods
- Flat Stake:
- Fixed $10 on every qualifying bet regardless of odds or edge.
- Kelly ¼:
- Stake = bankroll × (edge / (odds−1)) / 4. Uses rolling win rate as probability estimate.
- Confidence-weighted:
- Stake = (implied prob / rolling avg implied prob) × $10. Bets more on favorites, less on longshots. Uses previous bets' average — applicable in real time.
Recent Results — PPG Predictions vs Actual
How PPG predictions compared to actual match results
| Date | Match | PPG Pick | Prob | Fair Odds | Result | ✓ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct | Marsa vs Hammam-Lif | Marsa | 63.28% | 1.58 | 1 – 1 | ✗ |
| 23 Oct | Ben Guerdane vs Stade Tunisien | Ben Guerdane | 51.34% | 1.95 | 1 – 0 | ✓ |
| 23 Oct | Bizertin vs Hammam-Sousse | Bizertin | 94.92% | 1.05 | 3 – 1 | ✓ |
| 23 Oct | JS Omrane vs Olympique Béja | JS Omrane | 83.6% | 1.2 | 0 – 0 | ✗ |
| 18 Oct | Olympique Béja vs Etoile du Sahel | Etoile du Sahel | 52.91% | 1.89 | 1 – 2 | ✓ |
Upcoming Fixtures — PPG Predictions
Win probabilities for upcoming matches based on current PPG ratings
| Date | Match | PPG Pick | Prob | Fair Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept | Stade Tunisien vs Club Africain | Club Africain | 47.3% | 2.11 |
| 24 Oct | Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer vs Club Africain | *** | 0% | 0 |
| 24 Oct | ES Tunis vs Monastir | 🔒 Login or register for free to see predictions data. | ||
| 24 Oct | Etoile du Sahel vs CS Sfaxien | |||
| 24 Oct | Métlaoui vs Zarzis | |||
PPG vs WPPG — Biggest Divergence
Teams where PPG and Weighted PPG disagree most — indicates recent form shift
Worked Example — Marsa vs Hammam-Lif
Poisson / Correct Score
Select Match
Dixon-Coles Score Matrix — Progrès Sakiet Eddaïer vs Club Africain
23 Oct · Each cell shows the probability of that exact scoreline. Dixon-Coles corrected (ρ = -0.13). · Upcoming
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 26.9% | 5.6% | 0.8% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 1 | 27.6% | 8.1% | 0.9% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2 | 15.7% | 3.9% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 3 | 5.8% | 1.4% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 4 | 1.6% | 0.4% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 5 | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 6 | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Derived Markets
Correct Score — Top 12
Dixon-Coles vs Plain Poisson
Where the low-score correction adds value
Dixon-Coles Betting ROI
Backtested ROI using incremental Poisson/Dixon-Coles model — xG computed only from matches played before each bet.
| Strategy | Bets | Wins | Win % | P&L | ROI | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DC Value (1X2 edge > 3%) | 16 | 6 | 37.5% | $0.00 | 0% | |
| DC Home Pick (>50%) | 5 | 2 | 40% | −$9.80 | -19.6% | |
| DC Away Pick (>50%) | 2 | 2 | 100% | +$27.50 | +137.5% | |
| DC Draw (>28%) | 10 | 3 | 30% | −$16.50 | -16.5% | |
| DC Over 2.5 Value | 5 | 1 | 20% | −$25.00 | -50% | |
| DC BTTS Value | 5 | 2 | 40% | +$3.20 | +6.4% |
Staking Plan Comparison
Same Dixon-Coles bets, different stake sizing. Flat = $10 every bet. Kelly ¼ and Confidence-weighted alternatives.
| Strategy | Bets | Flat P&L | Flat ROI | Kelly ¼ P&L | Kelly ¼ ROI | Conf P&L | Conf ROI | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DC Value (1X2 edge > 3%) | 16 | $0.00 | 0% | −$26.39 | -67.44% | +$37.12 | +19.96% | |
| DC Home Pick (>50%) | 5 | −$9.80 | -19.6% | $0.00 | 0% | −$19.92 | -47.08% | |
| DC Away Pick (>50%) | 2 | +$27.50 | +137.5% | $0.00 | 0% | +$23.40 | +133.03% | |
| DC Draw (>28%) | 10 | −$16.50 | -16.5% | $0.00 | 0% | −$11.31 | -11.63% | |
| DC Over 2.5 Value | 5 | −$25.00 | -50% | $0.00 | 0% | −$20.09 | -41.24% | |
| DC BTTS Value | 5 | +$3.20 | +6.4% | $0.00 | 0% | −$0.64 | -1.12% |
Staking Methods
- Flat Stake:
- Fixed $10 on every qualifying bet regardless of odds or edge.
- Kelly ¼:
- Stake = bankroll × (edge / (odds−1)) / 4. Uses rolling win rate as probability estimate. Grows bankroll when winning, shrinks when losing.
- Confidence-weighted:
- Stake = (implied prob / rolling avg implied prob) × $10. Bets more on favorites, less on longshots. Uses your previous bets' average to calculate each stake — applicable in real time.
How Poisson Predictions Work
- Step 1 — Expected Goals:
- Home xG = Home Attack Strength × Away Defense Weakness × League Avg Home Goals. Each team's attack and defense ratings are calculated relative to the league average.
- Step 2 — Poisson Formula:
- P(k goals) = e⁻λ × λᵏ / k! — models the probability of scoring exactly k goals given the expected goals (λ).
- Step 3 — Score Matrix:
- Multiply home and away goal probabilities for every combination (0-0 through 6-6) to build a full probability grid for every possible scoreline.
- Step 4 — Dixon-Coles:
- Apply ρ correction to fix Poisson's underestimation of low-scoring draws (0-0, 1-1, 1-0, 0-1). This is the key improvement over basic Poisson.
- Step 5 — Derive Markets:
- Sum probabilities from the matrix to derive 1X2, Over/Under, BTTS, and correct score probabilities — then convert to fair odds for value identification.
Elo Rating
Current Elo Ratings
All teams ranked by Elo. Start rating: 1500. K-factor: 32. Home advantage: +65 Elo.
Elo → Win Probability Table
How Elo difference translates to win probability.
| Elo Diff | P(Higher wins) | Fair Odds | Typical Matchup |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 50.0% | 2.00 | Evenly matched |
| 50 | 57.1% | 1.75 | Mid vs mid-lower |
| 100 | 64.0% | 1.56 | Top-8 vs bottom-8 |
| 150 | 70.3% | 1.42 | Top-4 vs relegation |
| 200 | 76.0% | 1.32 | Leader vs bottom half |
| 250 | 80.8% | 1.24 | Leader vs bottom 3 |
| 300 | 84.9% | 1.18 | Ben Guerdane vs Hammam-Sousse |
Elo Rating History — Top 6
How the top 6 teams' Elo ratings evolved across the season.
Elo Betting ROI
Backtested ROI using incremental Elo ratings — ratings computed from matches played before each bet.
| Strategy | Bets | Wins | Win % | P&L | ROI | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elo Value (edge > 3%) | 18 | 4 | 22% | −$1.00 | -0.56% | |
| Elo Favourite | 21 | 12 | 57% | +$63.70 | +30.33% | |
| Elo Home Pick (>55%) | 1 | 1 | 100% | +$7.00 | +70% | |
| Elo Draw (>28%) | 4 | 2 | 50% | +$14.50 | +36.25% |
Staking Plan Comparison
Same Elo bets, different stake sizing. Flat = $10 every bet. Kelly ¼ and Confidence-weighted alternatives.
| Strategy | Bets | Flat P&L | Flat ROI | Kelly ¼ P&L | Kelly ¼ ROI | Conf P&L | Conf ROI | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elo Value (edge > 3%) | 18 | −$1.00 | -0.56% | +$5.22 | +147.04% | −$25.38 | -11.42% | |
| Elo Favourite | 21 | +$63.70 | +30.33% | +$47.23 | +23.35% | +$25.57 | +13.19% | |
| Elo Home Pick (>55%) | 1 | +$7.00 | +70% | $0.00 | 0% | +$7.00 | +70% | |
| Elo Draw (>28%) | 4 | +$14.50 | +36.25% | $0.00 | 0% | +$15.15 | +38.26% |
Staking Methods
- Flat Stake:
- Fixed $10 on every qualifying bet regardless of odds or edge.
- Kelly ¼:
- Stake = bankroll × (edge / (odds−1)) / 4. Uses rolling win rate as probability estimate. Grows bankroll when winning, shrinks when losing.
- Confidence-weighted:
- Stake = (implied prob / rolling avg implied prob) × $10. Bets more on favorites, less on longshots. Uses your previous bets' average to calculate each stake — applicable in real time.
How Elo Ratings Work
- Step 1 — Starting Rating:
- Every team starts at 1500. Higher Elo means a stronger team.
- Step 2 — Expected Score:
- E(A) = 1 / (1 + 10^(R_B − R_A) / 400). If Arsenal is rated 1600 and Wolves is 1450, Arsenal's expected score is 0.71.
- Step 3 — Update After Match:
- R_new = R_old + K × (S − E), where S is the actual result (1 = win, 0.5 = draw, 0 = loss) and K=32 controls sensitivity.
- Step 4 — Home Advantage:
- Home team gets +65 Elo boost when calculating expected scores, reflecting the statistical home advantage in football.
- Step 5 — Betting:
- Convert Elo difference into win/draw/loss probabilities, compare against bookmaker odds, and bet when the model spots value.
Value Scanner
No upcoming matches with odds available. Please check back later.